Posted by
Michael DeWeese on Monday, July 07, 2008 1:04:20 PM
A lot of people are questioning the war in Iraq and why the U.S. and it’s democratic allies are there and why those leaders want to stay there until there is a complete win against the insurgency. A glance at any map of the middle east might give even the most strategically challenged a clue. In 1979, the U.S. Embassy in Iran was attacked (an act of war) by the Islamic Revolution in Iran. President Carter at the time of the revoulution in Iran had refused to support the Shah of Iran (a long time ally of the U.S.) because he did not personally ‘like’ the Shah. As a result, the Shah fell to the religious extremist revolution, and the U.S. Embassy was attacked and the U.S. citizens inside taken ‘hostage’. With Iraq on the west border, Afghanistan and Pakistan on the east border, it is very clear why the long term strategy of the democracies of the world is to encourage and support democratic allies in those countries.
Since 1979 Iran has been on an influence agenda worldwide and in particular in the middle east.
Support of Hezbollah with money and weapons has caused murder and mayhem in Lebanon. Lebanon at one time was considered the Riviera of the Middle East. Now as a result of the religious fanatics of Hezbollah, Lebanon is a democracy struggling to survive.
Support of Hamas has created a civil war within the Palestinian’s between the Hamas and Fatah factions. Halting any progress the Palestine’s had made in their effort’s to make peace with Israel and regain their lost lands. Hamas had bought the votes of the Palestinian people with the support of the Iranians. As soon as they where in power, they moved to change the Palestinian democratic system to a religious dictatorship model similar to Iran’s.
Iran’s research and development of nuclear technologies is acknowledged by Iran. There is a dispute about wether it is only for peacefull purposes, or if they are developing nuclear weapon technologies. Considering Iran’s President Ahmadinejad’s speech’s where he says his country would like to see Israel wiped off the map, nuclear weaponry would not be outside of their interests to achieve their goals.
Insurgency support in Iraq with money and weapons such as the explosive formed penetrating warhead has lead to deaths of the Iraq and Coalition troops trying to bring peace and stability to people who have lived under an oppressive dictatorship for decades.
Now there are reports of possible biological weapons research on endangered species monkeys being imported to Iran from Africa ( http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8919 ).
In the past, Iraq was a relatively strong country and was a buffer against Iran. Iraq’s leader, Saddam Hussein, became a problem for the rest of the world, not just his own country’s population, during the early 1990’s. As a result of his invasion of Kuwait, his armed forces where severely cut back in force. To try to remain as an image of strength, he allowed he world to believe he had WMD type weapons in stock and under developement. He built sham developement sites and vehicles to perpetuate this image. He did not believe the U.S. would attack him over this and he would be able to maintain some semblance of an image of strength in his country. This miscalculation by Saddam Hussein resulted in his military deposition by Coalition forces.
With Iraq’s military no longer a buffer against Iran, the Coalition will need to ensure that Iraq is restrengthened and able to deflect Iranian influences inside their borders and it’s ability to provide support for Hezbollah and Hamas through any porous borders. The long term stability of the middle east will depend solely on the ability of the democracies in the region to remain stable and not succumb to the Iranian religious dictatorship.